Advisory Memo: Kapur vs. USANA

January 29, 2013
An advisory memorandum summarizing the decision in Kapur v. USANA. USANA investors alleged the company violated anti-fraud statutes by hiding the resemblance between USANA and a pyramid scheme; misleading investors about the long-term sustainability of the company's sales growth and business model; and the potential impact of the Federal Trade Commission's (FTC) business opportunity rule. The case was dismissed. A copy of the decision is attached to the memo.
Complaints:
Kapur
Defendants:
USANA Health Sciences, Inc. et al.
Text of Complaint:
Decision:
    Categories:
    • Government Relations
    • Anti-Pyramid Laws
    • Trade
    • United States
    Tags:

    Related Court Cases and Litigations